Difference between revisions of "Template:2011 NL Central standings"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
| [[2011 Cincinnati Reds season|Cincinnati Reds]] || 67 || 66 || {{Winning percentage|67|66}} || 13 || 37–30 || 30–36
 
| [[2011 Cincinnati Reds season|Cincinnati Reds]] || 67 || 66 || {{Winning percentage|67|66}} || 13 || 37–30 || 30–36
 
|- {{#switch:{{{team}}}|PIT|PIT=bgcolor="#CCFFCC"}}
 
|- {{#switch:{{{team}}}|PIT|PIT=bgcolor="#CCFFCC"}}
| [[2011 Pittsburgh Pirates season|Pittsburgh Pirates]] || 62 || 71 || {{Winning percentage|62|71}} || 17 || 31–37 || 31–34
+
| [[2011 Pittsburgh Pirates season|Pittsburgh Pirates]] || 62 || 71 || {{Winning percentage|62|71}} || 18 || 31–37 || 31–34
 
|- {{#switch:{{{team}}}|CHC|CHC=bgcolor="#CCFFCC"}}
 
|- {{#switch:{{{team}}}|CHC|CHC=bgcolor="#CCFFCC"}}
 
| [[2011 Chicago Cubs season|Chicago Cubs]] || 57 || 77 || {{Winning percentage|57|77}} || 23½ || 32–37 || 25–40
 
| [[2011 Chicago Cubs season|Chicago Cubs]] || 57 || 77 || {{Winning percentage|57|77}} || 23½ || 32–37 || 25–40

Revision as of 04:31, 29 August 2011

NL Central W L Pct. GB Home Road
Milwaukee Brewers 81 54 Template:Winning percentage 50–16 31–38
St. Louis Cardinals 70 64 Template:Winning percentage 10½ 35–31 35–33
Cincinnati Reds 67 66 Template:Winning percentage 13 37–30 30–36
Pittsburgh Pirates 62 71 Template:Winning percentage 18 31–37 31–34
Chicago Cubs 57 77 Template:Winning percentage 23½ 32–37 25–40
Houston Astros 44 90 Template:Winning percentage 36½ 23–42 21–47
Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage

This is a template that was created to easily update every article with the 2011 MLB National League Central standings. To use the update on any article, insert:

{{2011 NL Central standings}}

To highlight the Houston Astros, insert:

{{2011 NL Central standings|team=HOU}}

For the other teams, use:

  • Chicago Cubs - CHC
  • Cincinnati Reds - CIN
  • Milwaukee Brewers - MIL
  • Pittsburgh Pirates - PIT
  • St. Louis Cardinals - STL

See also