Template:Did you know nominations/A. L. Burt
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 20:26, 24 February 2019 by imported>Usernameunique (Comment)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
A. L. Burt
- ... that because of A. L. Burt (pictured), boys won World War I and a girl was in three plane crashes?
- ALT1:... that A. L. Burt (pictured) caused a girl to get into three plane crashes?
- Reviewed: HMS Sportsman
- Comment: (pictured) could also be (founder pictured) (as the article is about the company, not the company's namesake), but I prefer the former, as it better hides the punchline while still being technically correct.
5x expanded by Usernameunique (talk). Self-nominated at 10:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC).
- Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Thanks for the review, Template:U. QPQ is provided above (HMS Sportsman). The hooks are sourced to Gowen 2009 (The Boy Allies of the Navy presents "the boy heroes practically winning the war single-handedly") and Abreu 1984 (Beverly Gray in three plane crashes). --Usernameunique (talk) 21:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Reply to Thanks for the ref. The rules at WP:DYK say that Template:Tq (bolding added), so that's why I didn't pass it yet --DannyS712 (talk) 21:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Template:U. The link is provided above: It's the first bullet point after ALT1. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:56, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Reply to I can see that you started the QPQ, but my understanding is that this can't pass until your QPQ is finished --DannyS712 (talk) 21:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:U, finished means that all the criteria have been checked, not that the review has led to a pass, and/or the successful running of an article on the main page. It does cause some issues (i.e., others have to pick up the slack) when a reviewer disappears from a review after doing the initial go-through, but it prevents articles from getting unnecessarily held up. You would find little trouble using this review, for instance—in its current state—as a QPQ for a nomination of yours. --Usernameunique (talk) 22:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Reply to I've never seen that before, but given that the nom disappeared whatever. Good to go --DannyS712 (talk) 22:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Template:U. Could you please add the tick to ensure that it passes through? What qualifies as a "finished" review is pretty standard, which, if you do some more DYKs, I am sure you will see. Hopefully you do; I enjoyed reading the Alabama v. North Carolina article today. --Usernameunique (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Reply to I've never seen that before, but given that the nom disappeared whatever. Good to go --DannyS712 (talk) 22:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:U, finished means that all the criteria have been checked, not that the review has led to a pass, and/or the successful running of an article on the main page. It does cause some issues (i.e., others have to pick up the slack) when a reviewer disappears from a review after doing the initial go-through, but it prevents articles from getting unnecessarily held up. You would find little trouble using this review, for instance—in its current state—as a QPQ for a nomination of yours. --Usernameunique (talk) 22:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Reply to I can see that you started the QPQ, but my understanding is that this can't pass until your QPQ is finished --DannyS712 (talk) 21:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Template:U. The link is provided above: It's the first bullet point after ALT1. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:56, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Reply to Thanks for the ref. The rules at WP:DYK say that Template:Tq (bolding added), so that's why I didn't pass it yet --DannyS712 (talk) 21:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Template:Od Restoring back to nominations page. A discussion here settled on an acceptable hook, restated below. This could run with or without the image above.
- ALT2: ... that Beverly Gray was able to survive three plane crashes thanks to A. L. Burt (pictured)? --Usernameunique (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping this is
also okay. I think the image should be used, but if not that's fine --DannyS712 (talk) 20:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tick, Template:U. I've added (pictured) above, but it can be removed if needed. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping this is
