Template:Did you know nominations/Abelsonite

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 11:55, 7 January 2013 by imported>EdChem (expand)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Abelsonite

5x expanded by Chris857 (talk). Self nom at 03:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Article Issues
  • Expansion is 2179/256 = 8.51... > 5x as required.
  • Expansion occurred on 7 January 2012, so date requirements satisfied.
  • Policy - neutrality and citations are fine. Copyvio check to follow.
Hook Issues
  • Sentence supporting original hook is uncited, but may be in the reference from the sentence following.
  • Sentence supporting ALT1 is cited. Reference check to follow.
  • Hook length is fine
  • As a chemist, I find ALT1 more interesting - when thinking of substances leading to minerals, chlorophyll does not strike me as a common source. That a mineral is only found in one area strikes me more as a "So what?" kind of fact. The material in the article about geoporphyrins makes me wonder if a better hook (by combining with ALT1) might be:
ALT2: ... that the mineral abelsonite probably formed from chlorophyll and is the only known crystalline geoporphyrin?
I would be interested in the submitter's thoughts on linking to chlorophyll a rather than chlorophyll.
  • Hook neutrality is not a problem.
QPQ reviewing requirement
  • Chris857's user page claims over 5 DYK credits, so this requirement applies. Chris857 did do a DYK review for chinchaga fire. Vensatry also claimed credit for this same review here. I don't know whether this is acceptable - for two editors to both be credited for a review - but I would credit Chris857's claim to the review over Vensatry's both for comprehensiveness and accuracy.
Other thoughts
I will return and check copyvio and referencing issues later, hopefully after Chris has added a reference for the original hook. EdChem (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)