Template:Did you know nominations/Anna L. Peterson
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 22:51, 27 September 2016 by imported>DYKReviewBot (Automatically reviewing nomination: There may be issues which need to be addressed (Problems? Report it.))
DYK toolbox |
---|
Anna L. Peterson
- ... that Anna L. Peterson argues that the usual separation of animal and environmental ethics is based on mistaken conceptions of humans, animals, nature and their relationship?
(Source: From Andrew Woodhall's review of Peterson's book: "Peterson's book offers an appraisal of current approaches to environmental and animal ethics and deftly critiques the traditional division between the two fields. Attempts to unite the two fields, Peterson claims, have made little progress. Most have concluded that the divide between the two is irreconcilable, but Peterson argues that the divide is counterintuitive, does not reflect our current practice, and does not represent nature, nonhuman-animals, or humanity, correctly. // Throughout the book Peterson attempts to demonstrate why other theories have failed, arguing that the mutual exclusivity of the two fields derives from each relying on an incorrect idea of how nature, nonhumans, and humans relate to—and depend upon— each other.")
- Comment: Created as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/2016 Women in Philosophy Drive. Josh Milburn (talk) 20:47, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Created by J Milburn (talk). Self-nominated at 20:47, 24 September 2016 (UTC).
- REDIRECT Template:•
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 20:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 3159 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- Note that this is a biographical article about a living person. All claims must be cited to a reliable source.
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 44.1% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- REDIRECT Template:•
Some overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 169 characters
- ✗ J Milburn has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)