Template:Did you know nominations/Anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 01:38, 2 January 2014 by imported>BlueMoonset (more review detail needed)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo
- ... that after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, there was an anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo, where two died and massive damage was done to Serb-owned houses, schools and other institutions?
- Comment: Well-documented incident, linked to historically significant events in 1914.
Created by Antidiskriminator (talk). Nominated by Anonimski (talk) at 09:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC).
- ALT1... that after the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, there was an anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo, where two died and massive damage was done to Serb-owned houses, schools and other institutions?
- --Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:19, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- What about
- ALT2 ... that following the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, there was an anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo (pictured)? --Zoupan 18:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- I am fine with it.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Full review needed. (Note: original hook is 197 characters; initial "... " is not counted. While technically not over 200 characters, though, it is unnecessarily long.) BlueMoonset (talk) 17:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Good to go with ALT two, ref four has an embedded quote which verifies the hook. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
"Good to go" is not sufficient; more explanation is needed, especially in light of the issues found with another brief review at Template:Did you know nominations/Fermanagh Mallards F.C.. Please detail what was checked, including length, newness, neutrality (especially important in an article about a pogrom), sourcing in the article as a whole, close paraphrasing, etc. (There's a "better source needed" template in the article that should at least have been addressed.) Reviews should always touch on all the facets that were checked, so hook promoters can get a sense of the work that was done. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
