Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas white-eye
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 21:38, 14 December 2019 by imported>Yoninah (yes)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Christmas white-eye
- ... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced its risk of extinction?
- ALT1:... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced the bird's risk of extinction?
- Reviewed: Germania Life Insurance Company Building
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC).
-
Shuipzv3, please expand your review to cover the DYK criteria you checked specifically and were met, which should be length, newness, neutrality, sourcing, freedom from copyvio/close paraphrasing, hook interest, length, and neutrality, and that the QPQ was adequate. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate.
Shuipzv3 (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? Yoninah (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Well I don't really think its misleading, but we could just be bold and go for a "small second population". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate.