Template:Did you know nominations/Community Based Program Design

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 08:58, 20 May 2014 by imported>Launchballer (+comment)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Community Based Program Design

  • Comment: This passed AfC on April 9, 2014.

Moved to mainspace by Philroc (talk). Self nominated at 00:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg It never ceases to amaze me the great hypocrisy of AfC - good articles get rejected, yet this has somehow made it. While it is long enough, new enough, QPQ unnecessary, no copyvios found, there is too much WP:NPOV-violating content. Furthermore, the referencing is poor and insufficient for an AfC pass, never mind a mainpage appearance. I can't even see what this is notable for. Now being considered for deletion at AfD.--Launchballer 09:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Launchballer, I see you have tagged the article AFD. As I stated in my comment on the AFD template, this article is part of a course assignment from the University of Michigan. I think it's inappropriate to delete the article. And the fact that this is a course assignment may shed some light on why something you personally call "hypocrisy" - your overt POV - is here. Wikipedia allegedly encourages university student participation. We would do well not to discourage that participation by deleting student efforts. — Maile (talk) 00:14, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
  • 16px While an article is at AfD, it is put on hold at DYK until the AfD concludes. There is no point reviewing an article that may end up being deleted, but it would be inappropriate to delete it when it may be notable after all. Should it survive AfD, then the "review again" icon can be added to this nomination, but not before. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I have withdrawn the AfD because it's part of a course assignment but I recommend it be moved back to AfC and worked on whilst part of the assignment - this isn't good enough for DYK at the moment, and this is for new content.--Launchballer 08:58, 20 May 2014 (UTC)