Template:Did you know nominations/DPP v Santana-Bermudez

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 04:18, 28 June 2018 by imported>Daniel Case (OK)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

DPP v Santana-Bermudez

  • ... that the case of DPP v Santana-Bermudez held that an assault can be committed when no positive action has been taken in order to do so? Source: Bailii
    • ALT1:... in English law, DPP v Santana-Bermudez found that a person lying about sharp items in their pocket when being searched, is liable to be charged with assault if the searcher is injured as a result? Source: Bailii

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 19:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC).

Symbol confirmed.svg Length, history and reference verified; Earwig detects no possible copyvio. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg Template:Ping Review is incomplete as not all of the criteria have been mentioned. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Template:Replyto OK, since I didn't mention it, the hook is cited within the article. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but think the ALT1 should be written more clearly. We don't really need to spell out the whole case name, do we? Could we write:
  • ALT1a: ... that a 2003 English court case ruled that someone who lies about having sharp items in their pocket while being searched can be charged with assault if the searcher is injured as a result? Yoninah (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Template:Replyto Yes, this works better, especially because that way we know what country the case came from. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)