Template:Did you know nominations/Elephantomyia irinae
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 09:05, 19 October 2015 by imported>Gatoclass (^p3)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 09:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Elephantomyia irinae
- ... that, when described, at least five males of the crane fly Elephantomyia irinae (pictured) were known from Baltic amber?
- Reviewed: Dysidea arenaria
- Comment: Coren bot notice is a false positive of a bad wiki mirror. :-/
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 20:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC).
I have returned this from prep as I cannot see any mention of "six males" of the species anywhere in the article. Gatoclass (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)- Template:U please respond. Gatoclass (talk) 12:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:PingCorrected, I somehow transposed five specimens with six species when writing the hook. there are five specimens known.--Kevmin § 13:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U, it still doesn't mention that all five specimens are male. Gatoclass (talk) 07:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:PingIt does actually. That is found in the table on page two of the paper where Kania lists the specimens examined in the study. The entry for E. irinae list five specimens and lists all of them as male.--Kevmin § 10:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U, it still doesn't mention that all five specimens are male. Gatoclass (talk) 07:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
