Template:Did you know nominations/Erythranthe cuprea

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 03:44, 15 February 2017 by imported>HalfGig
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Erythranthe cuprea

Erythranthe cuprea
Erythranthe cuprea

Created by HalfGig (talk). Self-nominated at 18:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Nominated same day it was moved to main namespace, and just over 1500 bytes, satisfying length and date criteria. The source text refers to "petal lobe anthocyanin pigmentation" polymorphism, but the article only states "petal lobe polymorphism"; is there a reason for the use of the more general statement? Can you clarify the term "duplication" in the quotation; is this gene duplication or chromosomal duplication? (Perhaps remove the quotation, rephrase, and provide a link for duplication and "trans-regulatory mechanism".) In "Its characteristics in nectar and petal shape...", the source refers more specifically to "corolla", not just petal; should this be mentioned in the text? I've added several links to the article - can you please ensure they are correct, and if not, update them? Image is properly licenced and created by uploader, and is suitable at the scale needed for DYK. Hook is short and cited, but I don't think it will generate many views for the article. Perhaps you can mention other species that have cyanidin (with ref, of course), or perhaps that the colouration is derived by a different mechanism from other species in the genus. Mindmatrix 00:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Forgot to mention, QPQ completed, and I will AGF for the three sources I cannot access. Mindmatrix 00:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  • I've made some edits related to the polymorphism and the duplication. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 02:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Template:Ping Pls review again. I asked the expert Sminthopsis84 to bail me out again. I'm having trouble of thinking of other hooks that aren't too technical. HalfGig talk 03:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)