Template:Did you know nominations/Every Frame a Painting
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 00:04, 28 June 2019 by imported>Axem Titanium (re)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Every Frame a Painting
- ... that creators Taylor Ramos and Tony Zhou developed the editing style of Every Frame a Painting to avoid copyright claims from YouTube's Content ID system? Source: [1] [2]
Created by Axem Titanium (talk). Self-nominated at 23:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC).
Template:Ping Doing this now - basic criterion passed, so I'm gonna go for some factual checks: On the job division - I seem to read the Medium blog post as Zhou doing the editing, not both of them for finals. But otherwise, it seems good to go. Juxlos (talk) 22:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing the review! The Medium post notes that the videos are credited "Written & Edited by Taylor Ramos and Tony Zhou". Collaborating on the final edit seems to be the best summary I could come up with for "I edit every draft [...] I am the first and last audience that sees everything before it goes out [...] he is the editor, and I am the editor’s editor." The post also gives an example "you’ll see Tony edited version 1 of the Chuck Jones video by himself. Then we worked together for 7 days to create version 7 (the final)". Axem Titanium (talk) 22:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- It's a little bit hard to get from the source - do you think you can reword it to better reflect what they're saying. I don't see the collaboration part from the quotes. Juxlos (talk) 19:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- I made a small wording change. Does that reflect better? Axem Titanium (talk) 06:37, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- It's a little bit hard to get from the source - do you think you can reword it to better reflect what they're saying. I don't see the collaboration part from the quotes. Juxlos (talk) 19:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing the review! The Medium post notes that the videos are credited "Written & Edited by Taylor Ramos and Tony Zhou". Collaborating on the final edit seems to be the best summary I could come up with for "I edit every draft [...] I am the first and last audience that sees everything before it goes out [...] he is the editor, and I am the editor’s editor." The post also gives an example "you’ll see Tony edited version 1 of the Chuck Jones video by himself. Then we worked together for 7 days to create version 7 (the final)". Axem Titanium (talk) 22:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hold it. Writing like "flying under the algorithm's radar" doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article, and I'm not so sure "unpacks a particular idea" does either. Sorry, grumpy today. EEng 22:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- What exactly is your objection to it? "Doesn't belong in an encyclopedia" is pretty vague. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- They're hip idioms. Write instead, "avoid being flagged by the algorithm" and "explores/highlights one particular idea/concept". Like I said, I was in a grumpy mood, and icky writing isn't a DYK bar, but I'd rather not see it featured on the main page. EEng 21:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware my writing was so hip. Changed. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- They're hip idioms. Write instead, "avoid being flagged by the algorithm" and "explores/highlights one particular idea/concept". Like I said, I was in a grumpy mood, and icky writing isn't a DYK bar, but I'd rather not see it featured on the main page. EEng 21:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- What exactly is your objection to it? "Doesn't belong in an encyclopedia" is pretty vague. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)