Template:Did you know nominations/FTC v. Actavis, Inc.
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 19:36, 30 October 2013 by imported>Mandarax (Replace "Did you know" with "..."; add bold link to DYK article; indicate ALT; add italics; add "?"; rm quotation marks from around hook, as these sometimes erroneously get copied to Prep)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
FTC v. Actavis, Inc.
- ... that reverse payment settlements of patent litigations are not immune from antitrust liability in the United States?
Created/expanded by EricChuang676 (talk). Nominated by Anthonysutardja (talk) at 16:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC).
The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like ALT1: .... that United States Supreme Court case FTC v. Actavis, Inc. challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry? The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --S.G.(GH) ping! 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)