Template:Did you know nominations/Fenestraja plutonia

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 09:40, 4 March 2015 by imported>Cwmhiraeth (Second opinion)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fenestraja plutonia

Created by Ryan shell (talk). Self nominated at 15:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC).

I'll review this. —Noswall59 (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
Article: The content is long enough (>3000 characters), new enough (created 2 March), cites sources throughout, doesn't appear to contain copyrighted text.
Hook: you ought to cite the actual specimen ([1]). The hook is interesting enough and short enough. I am not sure how grammatical this is: "a single specimen, supposedly an Underworld windowskate, was collected". Should it be specimen "of" instead of "an"?
Other: QPQ checks out. No image used.
Symbol question.svg Other than the grammar niggle above, this looks ready to go. —Noswall59 (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. Ryan shell (talk) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. I think it passes as DYk, but, as this is my first review, I will ask for a second opinion on the talk-page. Well done, —Noswall59 (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Giving a second opinion; the reviewer has covered the necessary DYK criteria and I agree with the assessment made. I have tweaked the hook for smoother reading and to remove the POV "supposedly". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)