Template:Did you know nominations/Fordillidae, Fordilla, Pojetaia
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 17:25, 9 January 2012 by imported>TonyTheTiger (reply)
Fordillidae, Fordilla, Pojetaia
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Fordillidae
- Fordilla
- Pojetaia )
- ... that both Fordilla and Pojetaia, Cambrian members of the extinct bivalve family Fordillidae, are part of the Turkish small shelly fauna?
- Reviewed: Sargassumfish
- Comment: see Elicki and Gürsu 2009
Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 18:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Passing comment (aka not a review): QPQs? Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- Last I was aware the consensus was one review per hook, as opposed to one per article in a hook.--Kevmin § 18:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- I seem to remember differently. I guess it depends on the reviewer's choice... Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- It has always been one per article.
- Please Make the Fordillidae ref 3 more precise. It seems to be providing a reference for two sentences. It should not require that I read 25 pages to WP:V this hook.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- The articles pass for length and date. The refs seem to be WP:RS. The hook just needs to be verified, which I will do after the precise pages are indicated.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Re reference 3: See the abstract and introduction, which note the papers scope investigating the small shelly fauna of Turkeys Cal Tepe Formation.--Kevmin § 14:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- The point was for you to fix the inline citation for WP:V purposes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
