Template:Did you know nominations/Francis Doughty (clergyman)

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 13:11, 24 October 2015 by imported>Maile66 (Detailed review, this nomination passes)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Francis Doughty (clergyman)

Created by StAnselm (talk). Self-nominated at 02:58, 10 October 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Long enough, new enough, and hook is cited to RS. Good to go. LavaBaron (talk) 10:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg Template:Ping What about all the other DYK criteria? As a courtesy to the nominator, could you please list, so this stands a better chance of not being pulled from prep on something missed? — Maile (talk) 23:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Yup, it met all of them. Good to go. LavaBaron (talk) 07:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed. Please provide details of review. DYK review instructions Template:Tq Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYKReviewing guide — Maile (talk) 12:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg As per administrator ruling here, it's been determined no further review is needed. This is cleared for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 04:07, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg There was no such administrator ruling or determination; reinstating Maile's request for a new reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg A discussion in DYK Talk has failed consensus that the review is unacceptable; I don't want to engage in vote-counting but, to make things concise, I'll note 4 editors have proferred the belief it is acceptable, 4 have objected, and 2 have unclear opinions. For lack of a consensus to overturn the review, it is clear for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 15:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


Review by Maile
  • QPQ done by StAnselm October 10-13, 2015
Eligibility
  • Article created by StAnselm on October 9, 2015 and contains 1601 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
  • Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags
Hook, Sourcing and copyvio check
  • Every paragraph sourced
  • No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
  • Earwig's copyvio detector show no issues of concern: Earwig's check October 24, 2015
  • Hook is fine at 83 characters, NPOV, sourced and stated in the article.
Image
No image in either the hook or the article.