Template:Did you know nominations/I Hope You Find It

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewing guide WMFLabs Dup detector Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count Reviewers' template Disambig links External links Find sources (notability)

I Hope You Find It

• ( Back to T:TDYK
• Article history )

• ... that Miley Cyrus recorded "I Hope You Find It" for her 2010 film The Last Song?

• Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by CyrockingSmiler (talk). Self nominated at 08:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC).

• 16px Article new enough (promoted on 6 August), long enough, fully referenced. No QPQ required. Hook is mentioned in the lead, but not in the body, and is not supported by the accompanying reference. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:49, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

• Hawkeye7, CyrockingSmiler hasn't edited on Wikipedia since August 22, and clearly pulled up stakes (including deleting all comments made on a GA review he or she was working on). That said, I've found a source that confirms that Cyrus did the song for the movie—checking WP:DYK and WP:DYKSG, I see no requirement that hook facts cannot be solely in the lead. However, I'm quite puzzled that any GA review would pass an article where most of the facts in the lead are not in the body, given that MOS:LEAD is clearly a criterion that a GA must adhere to... but it was made a GA and nominated on time. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

• 16px Very true. I've seen hooks that were in the image captions and footnotes. The rules do allow this. Good to go now that it is referenced and I've verified the ref. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

• 16px The first paragraph under Live performances and promotion is uncited. Yoninah (talk) 23:09, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

• Yoninah, I've found a suitable reference, though it only covers the final sentence. Unfortunately, that reference (and a quick online check) shows that the facts in that final sentence were wrong: both the date of Cher's Dancing with the Stars appearance and when she performed it (which was not at the end of the program, as stated). The way the second sentence is worded of that section is worded, I'd expect her to have appeared on all six shows that next day, but that seems infeasible and something that certainly ought to have a citation. At this point, I'm worried about the article's accuracy and the broadness of its coverage (it seems to be very Cher-heavy), in addition to the fact that it clearly doesn't meet GA requirements. I'm strongly considering putting the article up for reassessment; I'll post here if I do so. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

• 16px I have just opened a good article reassessment on this article, and as one of the findings was close paraphrasing, this nomination is on hold until the reassessment has been completed. If the issues are resolved, then this review can continue; if the article is delisted, then I don't believe this can qualify for DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

• 16px The good article reassessment has closed, and the article has been delisted. As it is no longer a good article, it no longer qualifies for DYK. Marking this nomination as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)