Template:Did you know nominations/Ikuze! Kaitō Shōjo

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 01:37, 17 December 2012 by imported>Moscow Connection
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ikuze! Kaitō Shōjo

Created/expanded by Moscowconnection (talk). Self nom at 14:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Hook is referenced by foreign-language sources and accepted in good faith; article size is acceptable; meets every other guideline, as far as I'm concerned. The article is good to go. ComputerJA (talk) 07:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg The hook must be referenced by the end of the sentence in which the fact is stated, which is not the case here. Please be sure to add that source citation, even if it is used elsewhere in the paragraph. I also find it curious that the article never states whether the contract was in fact signed (and when); this should be made clear, as it is an event well in the past and must be known. In addition, the record label should be mentioned in the intro and the first Release paragraph, and I believe there is an error at the beginning of the Reception paragraph: it says "May 3, 2011", but as the single was released in 2010 (if the Chart section is correct), it should say "May 3, 2010". Finally, there are times when the prose is non-neutral, such as "The girls didn't lose their fighting spirit" in the Promotion paragraph, and needs to be given neutral phrasing. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
    I'm working on the issues you pointed out, that's why I didn't reply earlier. The whole paragraph is sourced from one article on the Oricon site. I didn't state whether the contract was signed because I don't know. Unrealiable sources say that Reni Takagi passed the test later. Also, later in the year fans noticed that she looked unhealthily thin. I will have to find more reliable sources to make it clear. The date was a typo. --Moscow Connection (talk) 17:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Additional note: as your sixth DYK nomination, this will also require a QPQ (quid pro quo) review before it can be approved. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:53, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
The rules say "5 DYK credits", so I thought that it was credits at the time of the nomination that counted. I will make a quid pro quo review for this one. --Moscow Connection (talk)
 Done Reviewed an article. --Moscow Connection (talk) 00:31, 17 December 2012 (UTC)