Template:Did you know nominations/Jashodaben Narendrabhai Modi
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 21:59, 30 July 2015 by imported>Mandarax (Format image)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Jashodaben Narendrabhai Modi
- ... that Jashodaben Narendrabhai Modi, the spouse of the Prime Minister of India, lives simply and prays often?
- ALT1:... that Jashodaben Narendrabhai Modi, the spouse of the Prime Minister of India, likes to pray?
- ALT2:... that Jashodaben, the spouse of the Prime Minister of India, spends time praying?
- Reviewed: Toussaint Coffee Liqueur
- Comment: This article has been deleted 4 times previously. I think it will be stable this time.
Created by Bluerasberry (talk). Self-nominated at 12:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC).
- Template:Yo Brilliant image - Why are we not using it at DYK? Its a brilliant bit of illustration and a superb gift. If we are going to use it then it would be good if someone confirms that it is a good likeness as its a nice looking picture. Victuallers (talk) 20:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Long enough, new enough, QPQ done. ALT0 short enough, sourced and the most interesting hook of the three. I couldn't see any neutrality or copyright issues. I agree, that that image is a superb image and have included it myself in this nomination. Good to go.--Launchballer 00:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
The image looks fine; my question is the copyright issue. Though Bluerasberry commissioned the image, I don't see any evidence on the license form that the creator has given up her copyright, and as Kodama Creative made the artwork, I'm not sure what would be required for this: a note to OTRS from Kodama releasing it to either Bluerasberry or the world? BlueMoonset (talk) 17:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Template:Yo So can we hold this until we know if a license is possible? It would need to be either an OTRS or the artist could put a cc by sa logo on her deviantart page I think. Sadly if we cannot get permission then it cant be in the article either but I'm hopeful that we show off this gift. Victuallers (talk) 20:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U Template:U Template:U This was routine work for hire and I have the copyright. I am the one who applied the free license to this work because I am the copyright holder. If requested, I can submit to OTRS a copy of the agreement in which the artist assigned the copyright of this work to me. The artist is knowledgeable about copyright, routinely provides commercial art and the copyright to companies as work for hire, and charged me a special fee explicitly for the transfer of copyright. Likewise, I chose this artist on the basis of their artistic merit and because they understood the implications of assigning copyright to me. I have never seen anyone send in an email to OTRS for a work for which they themselves claim copyright and uploaded but I know this is an odd case. Should I append an OTRS template to the file and send in my agreement? Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:15, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- First. Thank you!!! I understand the moral position and I was in two minds. On the one hand I understand your argument however I have bought paintings but my understanding is that at least in the UK I don't have the copyright. I believe I would need explicit signed transfer of the copyright. If this was not true then surely most images would not run out 70 years after the artists death?? .... because most would have been sold. I think we need some advice but I suspect that we do need "written" evidence not because we don't trust you (and I do) but because copyright law requires it. I would in your case to just take your word for it, but I can see this would create a precedent that might be abused by another editr. Victuallers (talk) 21:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
