Template:Did you know nominations/Lafler v. Cooper
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 12:24, 3 March 2018 by imported>Gerda Arendt (appr)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Lafler v. Cooper
... that in a dissenting opinion, Justice Scalia wrote that the US Supreme Court had elevated "plea bargaining from a necessary evil to a constitutional entitlement"?Source: "Today, however, the Supreme Court of the United States elevates plea bargaining from a necessary evil to a constitutional entitlement." (Template:Ussc)- ALT1: ... that when dissenting from the US Supreme Court's decision in Lafler v. Cooper, Justice Scalia wrote that the Court had elevated "plea bargaining from a necessary evil to a constitutional entitlement"? Source: "Today, however, the Supreme Court of the United States elevates plea bargaining from a necessary evil to a constitutional entitlement." (Template:Ussc)
- ALT2:
... that the US Supreme Court created a new body of constitutional law in Lafler v. Cooper?Source: "the court has created a new body of constitutional law" ([1] - ALT3:
... that in Lafler v. Cooper, the US Supreme Court held that criminal convictions can be overturned if defense counsel ineffectively plea bargained?Source: "A divided Supreme Court ruled for the first time Wednesday that the guarantee of effective legal representation applies to plea bargain agreements" ([2]) - ALT4:
... that in Lafler v. Cooper, the US Supreme Court held that criminal defendants have a constitutional right to an effective lawyer when plea bargaining?Source: "A divided Supreme Court ruled for the first time Wednesday that the guarantee of effective legal representation applies to plea bargain agreements" ([3])
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kyrö Distillery Company
- Comment: I'm aware of the neutrality complications from quoting from only one justice, so I proposed a number of other hooks. My only concern is that I can't seem to think of any brilliant, per se "hooky" hooks at the moment. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 02:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Moved to mainspace by L235 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC).
Substantial article on good sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I like the quote, because I think it shows best for the average reader what's going on, but I don't like it bolded, - the topic is the case, not the quote. Therefore ALT1. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)