Template:Did you know nominations/Nakamura Satoru

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 23:35, 27 February 2014 by imported>Gibmetal77 (re)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nakamura Satoru

A man in military uniform with medals

Created by MChew (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 12:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC).

  • Created on 22-Feb - new enoughSymbol confirmed.svg
2829 characters of prose - long enoughSymbol confirmed.svg
seems neutralSymbol confirmed.svg
some chunks of text lack inline citationsSymbol possible vote.svg
Dupuy quoted as a reference but not used in inline citationsSymbol possible vote.svg
offline sources are unverifiable - AGFSymbol voting keep.svg
hook - short enough, interesting & neutralSymbol confirmed.svg
QPQ not requiredSymbol confirmed.svg
image - PD, used in article, shows up well in smallSymbol confirmed.svg
Just some citations to sort out... --Gibmetal 77talk 2 me 00:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Ah yes. I asked the article creator if the book reference references all the text above it. I am still waiting for a reply. Thanks, Matty.007 17:07, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but I do not find this hook interesting. It is not at all surprising to me that a Japanese man in an old-looking military uniform might have been the son of a samurai -- and without the image there would nothing here of interest at all. The hook gives me no reason to want to read about this man. Is there something interesting about the son of a samurai becoming an officer in the early Imperial Japanese Army? Perhaps a different hook could be written about his military experience, for example:
I guess 'interestingness' is subjective... I think samurais are super cool and will always attract my attention. The original hook leaves me wanting to know more and I'd probably be more likely to click on the article than with ALT1. But that's just me Face-smile.svg --Gibmetal 77talk 2 me 00:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg Repeating the most severe of the icons used in the above review, since the software assumes the final icon is the one that holds. Gibmetal, for future reference, it's best only to use a single icon in your review—using many makes it hard for promoters to figure out what's up—but if you do use many, please also use a summary icon at the end that shows the overall status. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:39, 27 February 2014 (UTC)