Template:Did you know nominations/North Branch Shamokin Creek
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 18:36, 25 September 2015 by imported>Daniel Case (DYK rules trump LEADCITE here)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
North Branch Shamokin Creek
- ... that Pennsylvania's North Branch Shamokin Creek is too acidic to support aquatic life?
- ALT1:... that Pennsylvania's North Branch Shamokin Creek is too acidic to support aquatic life, but its pH has been rising?
- ALT2:... that Pennsylvania's North Branch Shamokin Creek is too acidic to support aquatic life and is coated with iron precipitate?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Black siskin (quadruple nom)
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 16:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC).
Length, history and reference verified. Just put the cites for the hooks (I prefer ALT2; it might work even better with the lead image) in and we can go with this (I also added the state, so people know where this creek is, and wikilinked the technical terms). Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
The hooks are referenced, not in the lead, but in the body. I have added the image. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 18:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Replyto LEADCITE notwithstanding, see Rule 3: "The fact(s) mentioned in the hook must be cited in the article ... Facts should have an inline citation." This applies to hook facts anywhere in the article—both in the intro and in the body, regardless of how extraordinary they aren't. Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)