Template:Did you know nominations/Ocasio v. United States
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 07:49, 28 May 2016 by imported>Sainsf (Reviewed)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ocasio v. United States
- ... that Justice Sonia Sotomayor described a recent a recent United States Supreme Court decision as "an unnatural outcome"?
- ALT1:... that one commentator suggested that a recent United States Supreme Court decision may "raise more questions than answers"?
- ALT2:... that one commentator opined that a recent United States Supreme Court decision "produced some particularly interesting divisions among the justices"?
- Reviewed: Filipe Melo (footballer)
5x expanded by Notecardforfree (talk). Self-nominated at 07:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC).
Article is long enough, more than 5x expanded within a week before nomination, QPQ done. Earwig's copyvio detector shows some paraphrasing [1], but I believe it is somewhat inevitable here. All hooks are interesting and each is supported by an inline citation. However, I would like to note a few points:
- "recent" may be confusing, as this refers to early May and now we are heading to early June, and we have no idea when this will appear on the main page.
- others have suggested that the case "raise more questions than answers." This line in the lead suggests it was not the opinion of "one commentator" as given in ALT1, and indeed is the opinion of just Rory Little as far as I understand. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)