Template:Did you know nominations/Washington State Route 546
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 01:01, 29 October 2018 by imported>Narutolovehinata5 (done)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Washington State Route 546
- ... that the predecessor to Washington State Route 546 was deleted from the state's highway system before being restored several years later? Source: Washington State Legislature
- Note: The DYK check tool incorrectly determines that this wasn't a five-fold expansion. The prior version was 945 characters, while the current is 4,801 characters.
- Reviewed: Athletic Bilbao in European football
5x expanded by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 07:35, 14 September 2018 (UTC).
- 16px The article was expanded 5x on Sept 14, prose is plenty long enough, and the article is within policy. The hook is under 200 characters and is interesting to a broad audience. Template:U, just let me know when the QPQ is done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping QPQ added above. Sorry about the delay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SounderBruce (talk • contribs) 21:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- 16px looks good now with the QPQ. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 02:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
16px Template:Ping Honestly I don't really see how this hook is interesting: is it considered unusual for a discontinued highway route to be restored later on? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Template:U, it's an 8 mile long highway, I don't know how much more interesting it can get. Do you have an alt you want to propose? If not, as the reviewer, I believe that the hook meets the guidelines and the green check mark should be restored. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Perhaps some discussion as to why it was first deleted and then why it was later restored could make for a better hook? Without context it just doesn't seem that interesting in my opinion. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Alt1: that... Washington State Route 546 runs east–west for eight miles near the Canadian border, connecting Lynden to Nooksack? Szzuk (talk) 21:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- This ALT isn't interesting at all, given that it's a simple description that can be applied to any road. If we're going this route, then something like this would have some amount of interest.
- ALT2: ... that despite being only eight miles (13 km) long, Washington State Route 546 is considered a major freight highway due to its connections to Interstate 5 and the Canadian border? Source: WSDOT
- I still greatly prefer the ALT0, which is something that makes this highway unique. SounderBruce 03:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
- We're going to run out of interesting (if any) things to talk about soon... Nova Crystallis (Talk) 17:24, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
- ALT 3 ... that during the construction of a roundabout on Washington State Route 546, road traffic had to be restricted to alternating, one way patterns? Source: Bellingham Herald
- ALT3 looks fine to me; ALT2 as well although less so. Template:Ping thoughts? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Alt0, Alt2, Alt3, and then Alt1 in that order. Alt1 is a simple descriptor and Alt3 is pretty common traffic management. I still like Alt0, but Alt2 would be fine with me as well. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- ALT3 looks fine to me; ALT2 as well although less so. Template:Ping thoughts? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- If we're going down the roundabout route, then the number (for such a short American highway) is probably more interesting than the alternating traffic. ALT1 is wholly unsuitable and ALT3 is boring. SounderBruce 21:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)