Template:Did you know nominations/Wojciech Sadurski
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 04:16, 21 October 2020 by imported>Piotrus
DYK toolbox |
---|
Wojciech Sadurski
- ... that according to law scholar Wojciech Sadurski, Poland is undergoing a "constitutional breakdown"? Source: Sadurski, Wojciech (2019). Poland's Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-884050-3.
- ALT1:... that law scholar Wojciech Sadurski says that the Law and Justice party has caused a "constitutional breakdown" in Poland? Source: same as above
- ALT2:... that hundreds of academics signed a letter opposing the "coordinated harassment campaign by the Polish ruling party" against law professor Wojciech Sadurski? Source: https://verfassungsblog.de/open-letter-in-support-of-professor-wojciech-sadurski/ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/04/long-arm-of-law-and-justice-the-sydney-professor-under-attack-from-polands-ruling-party https://www.euronews.com/2019/05/13/critic-of-poland-s-ruling-party-pis-slams-political-motivated-libel-cases
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 23:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC).
Article is new, neutral and long enough. It cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports moderate text similarities, which result mostly from quotes. All hooks are well-formatted. I prefer ALT2. It is interesting. Its length is within limit, and its fact is sourced inline. QPQ was done. Good to go. CeeGee 12:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment and ping User:CeeGee, User:Buidhe. I worry that this article is much less neutral than the corresponding Polish article. On pl wiki, his biography doesn't even have a section about 'criticism', and is structured in the usual form (education, work, etc.). But our biography seems significanty focused on his recent criticism of the government. I think this is not 'best practices' as far as WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE go. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)