Template:Criticism section
This article's Criticism section may compromise the article's neutral point of view of the subject. Possible resolutions may be to integrate the material in the section into the article as a whole, or to rewrite the contents of the section. Please see the discussion on the talk page. |
Contents
Description
This template is meant for articles with Criticism, Controversy or similarly-titled sections that segregate a series of negative details into one section.
Note that criticism and controversy sections are not prohibited by policy, and the tag should only be used if there is a real concern that the criticism section and its contents are causing trouble with the article's neutrality.
Adding this template to a section without opening any discussion of the matter on the article's talkpage may result in the template's removal from the article.
Usage
Place {{Criticism section}} at the top of the section. You may also include a date, using the following format:
{{Criticism section|date=January 2026}}
This template sorts articles into Category:Articles needing POV-check, or a dated subcategory thereof.
See also
- Wikipedia:Criticism essay
- List of Wikipedia articles with 'Criticism' or 'Controversy' sections
- Template:Undue weight
Redirects
- {{Criticism-section}}
- {{Controversy-section}}
- {{Criticism}}
- {{Csection}}
| The above documentation is transcluded from Template:Criticism section/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (edit | diff) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |