Template:Did you know nominations/2013 Milwaukee IndyFest

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 04:21, 5 March 2018 by imported>SporkBot (Replace a deprecated template (*mp))
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 19:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

2013 Milwaukee IndyFest

The template {{*mp}} has been deprecated since March 2018, and is retained only for old revisions. If this page is a current revision, please remove the template. ALT2:... that Ryan Hunter-Reay's win in the 2013 Milwaukee IndyFest makes him the first driver to win two consecutive races at the Milwaukee Mile since Tony Kanaan in 2006–07?
The template {{*mp}} has been deprecated since March 2018, and is retained only for old revisions. If this page is a current revision, please remove the template. ALT3:... that Marco Andretti won the pole position in the 2013 Milwaukee IndyFest, but had his car stall on lap 197, followed by his car stopping due to an electrical problem?
The template {{*mp}} has been deprecated since March 2018, and is retained only for old revisions. If this page is a current revision, please remove the template. Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Wirgman Building

Created by ZappaOMati (talk). Self nominated at 04:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px Interesting article. It meets the 1500 character requirement and was created within the past five days, but the Background paragraph has no citation.--Taiping Tulip (talk) 06:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Regardless, I added refs anyway. ZappaOMati 14:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
  • 16px The necessary references have indeed been added and check out, and given that the article and its corresponding hooks meet Wikipedia and DYK guidelines, this article is good to go for inclusion in DYK. I vote for ALT2. -- Caponer (talk) 00:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)