Template:Did you know nominations/Angels Camp Museum
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 21:28, 26 June 2012 by imported>Mikenorton (a bit too short)
Angels Camp Museum
- ... that Angels Camp Museum resides on the land where two of three Mother Lode veins are located?
- Reviewed: Una sull'altra
Created/expanded by User:SarahStierch (talk). Self nom at 00:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
FN 1 is inaccessible, and FN 2 cannot be accessed in my area because my zip code is out of the website's acceptable territory. FN 3 says that there are 200 miles of tunnels; is it "200 tunnels" or "200 miles of tunnels"? Still checking FN 4. Nevertheless, passes the 1,500 minimum requirement. --George Ho (talk) 23:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- By the way, FN 2 is viewable somehow, especially with the Find tool from a browser. --George Ho (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
FN 3 and FN 4 are accessible and verify information. FN 2 verifies information, as well, as I can see it. Still awaiting FN 1.... As for the hook, I wonder if more clarification is needed: Mother lode is located in some areas of California and Nevada, according to website itself. If not, maybe "ALT #" is needed? How about one of collections located at the museum, a documentary about a frog contest, or a free admission of Gold Rush Day? --George Ho (talk) 23:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Author had no notification on her talk page about this, so I put a notice there today. Maile66 (talk) 18:33, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'm actually getting ready to step on an airplane (in like...five minutes) so I'm probably not going to fiddle with this anytime soon :( I'm happy with any type of "fun fact" from it. I feel bad making others do the work, but, if people deem it worthy, mentioning the tunnels, the gold rush day...or the frogs (!) would be a-okay with me. Thanks guys. Sarah (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
I have made some corrections, so anybody else can feel free to review this fully. --George Ho (talk) 20:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
I feel that this article is too short as it stands. I know that it meets the 1500 character minimum, but the lead is repeated (more or less verbatim) in the rest of the article and without that it would be about 1350 characters. Mikenorton (talk) 21:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)