Template:Did you know nominations/Derbendcis

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 19:35, 22 December 2014 by imported>Panyd (Passed with original hook)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Derbendcis

Created by Antidiskriminator (talk). Self nominated at 22:05, 25 November 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg It's long enough, it's recent enough and I can't see any issues with the content. The hook is interesting, although I'm not totally sold on the wording; you might want to consider something like:
  • ALT1 ... that the Ottomans had to hire mercenaries to ensure the loyalty of their Derbendcis constabulary?" as an alternative. In either form, it meet the criteria for length and is directly cited in the article. QPQ's done, no image - good to go. Nice little article. Yunshui  14:16, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. I agree with ALT1.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed for ALT1. Yoninah (talk) 21:23, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
I think that the reviewer approved Alt1 when he stated that both original and ALT1 hook "meet the criteria for length and is directly cited in the article." --Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol voting keep.svg I have fixed references. All sources are highly reputable. New enough, long enough. Either hook is fine for me, including ALT1. --George Ho (talk) 03:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)