Template:Did you know nominations/Dickran Kouymjian
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of Dickran Kouymjian's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by OCNative (talk) 21:07, 17 March 2013 (UTC).
DYK toolbox |
---|
Dickran Kouymjian
- ... that Armenian historian Dickran Kouymjian has published more than a hundred articles on Armenian history and culture?
- Reviewed: Pope Anastasius II
Created by Proudbolsahye (talk). Self nominated at 22:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC).
- The article is new and long enough. The hook is not to long.
I am afraid that sources do not directly support the hook assertion. None of two sources used to support it does not specifically claim that articles were "on Armenian history and culture". I know that it was most probably the case, but maybe it would be better to reword the hook or to provide more sources which directly support the existing wording? --Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- The article is new and long enough. The hook is not to long.
- ALT1 ... that Armenian historian and professor Dickran Kouymjian was awarded the prestigious St.Mesrob Mashtots Medal from Karekin II, the Catholicos of All Armenians?
- ALT1a ... that Armenian historian and professor Dickran Kouymjian was awarded the St.Mesrob Mashtots Medal from Karekin II, the Catholicos of All Armenians?
- ALT2 ... that Armenian historian Dickran Kouymjian has published several books and more than a hundred articles?
- I think that ALT1 is the best, but without prestigious (it is puffery and unsourced, although it is obviously very prestigious)?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1a provided. I can prove it being prestigious, but I'd rather not risk puffery. Proudbolsahye (talk) 18:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
OK for ALT1a.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- I think that ALT1 is the best, but without prestigious (it is puffery and unsourced, although it is obviously very prestigious)?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)