Template:Did you know nominations/Kepler-1647b

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 00:39, 18 January 2017 by imported>Filedelinkerbot (Bot: Removing Commons:File:Kepler-1647 b transit eclipse.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by Hystrix (No permission since 10 January 2017).)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 16:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Kepler-1647b

[[File:|Script error: No such module "If empty".px |Artist's impression of Kepler-1647b ]]
Artist's impression of Kepler-1647b

Created by Hexafluoride (talk). Self-nominated at 15:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC).

  • I really don't like the notion of using a hook that could be disproved simply by finding a counterexample. It's the largest, and has the longest year, of any circumbinary planet that we've discovered so far; however, the universe is very big and there are many things to look at. DS (talk) 14:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
This is happening now, and it's a big discovery. I don't think it that should be excluded just because there's a possibility it will no longer be true in the near future. ¬Hexafluoride (talk) 22:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg New enough (Hexafluoride on 14 June 2016), long enough (2,211 characters "readable prose size"), not fully referenced. Hook fine, supported by online reference. Image on Commons, with appropriate licence. Editor has only one prior DYK, so no QPQ required. Good to go. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)