Template:Did you know nominations/Nubra River

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nubra River

Created by Mehrajmir13 (talk). Self-nominated at 10:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg This article replaces a redirect and is long enough and new enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no policy issues. A QPQ has been done. Template:Ping Please check the change I made to the article about the direction of river flow. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Template:Re-Sheer pathetic review. Which of my edits over the article; you don't agree with? WBGconverse 15:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Template:U directly affect the quality of content appearing at main page. Take the responsibility of your failure rather than blame my rudeness. WBGconverse 05:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Stop until I take a comprehensive look. Multiple concerns about using fake references (using cites that does not support what's cited) have been raised about the other creations by this author. WBGconverse 14:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  1. REDIRECT Template:Xmark

Fails basic requirements; after a purge of stuff written by the means of fake citations or poor-quality citations.WBGconverse 15:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

  • I expanded the article once again. The prose is now more than required.  MehrajMir (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg I reviewed the article according to the DYK criteria which does not include reviewing all the references. Template:Ping I will have another look at the article in a couple of days to see if it is stable and meets the other DYK requirements. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:32, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Wow. I presume that it was you who wrote that Template:Tq ? Last time I checked, WP:V and WP:RS were both included in our list of fundamental policies and guidelines. WBGconverse 05:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Handing over this acrimonious review to someone else as I have been working on the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg Now appears to meet DYK requirements, and was new enough at the time of nomination. My one suggestion is to revise the last sentence to better reflect the source content, to something along the lines of "The toxins eventually reach the Indus River where there is potential to impact millions of people". NoGhost (talk) 05:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Ok looks good, sorry for the slow response. I still find some of the present/future verb tenses in the last paragraph awkward ("20,000 troops stationed[...]" vs. "The toxins will eventually[...]") for an encyclopedic entry, but I think this has more to do with my personal preference and shouldn't impact the DYK nom. NoGhost (talk) 23:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but the hook quickly moves away from the main subject to a glacier and a mountain range. Could you write something more to the point about the river? Yoninah (talk) 20:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • This is probably promotionable; wait. WBGconverse 11:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Article rewrote in near-entirety. Struck hook which is factually inaccurate. WBGconverse 13:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)