Template:Did you know nominations/Oecophylla longinoda

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 01:06, 1 February 2018 by imported>Yoninah (to Prep 2)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 01:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Oecophylla longinoda

  • ... that the African weaver ant has been used to control the coconut bug? Source: "A major focus of integrated pest management programs against this pest has been on the use of the predatory weaver ant, Oecophylla longinoda"

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 07:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC).

I'll take this on though I will need some oversight. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS)   11:18, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Article 1, the ant:
Template:Thumbs up Article is long enough
Template:Thumbs up Article is not a stub
Template:Thumbs up Article is new enough
Template:Thumbs up Article is neutral
Template:Thumbs up Nominator has done QPQ
? Hook interesting, cited inline etc
  • Article 2, the bug:
? Article is long enough
? Article is not a stub
? Article is new enough
? Article is neutral
? Nominator has done QPQ
? Hook interesting, cited inline etc
Final approval (hopefully) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:18, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg For the coconut bug article: new and long enough, QPQ done, Earwig detects no copyvios, within policy, hook checks out. The ant article has already been reviewed and upon a brief double-check it looks fine to me as well. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)