Template:Did you know nominations/Okawachi Pumped Storage Power Station
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 11:36, 2 December 2015 by imported>Yoninah (ty)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Okawachi Pumped Storage Power Station
... that the Okawachi Pumped Storage Power Station is one of the largest pumped-storage hydroelectric power stations in Japan?
Created by Ita140188 (talk). Nominated by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) at 03:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC).
- Template:U
Article length and date of posting are ok but the fourth paragraph is not referenced. Pl fix reference so that I can verify the text. The hook is interesting, cited and verified. QPQ done.Nvvchar. 04:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- I've left a message for the author of the article, Template:U. He or she should hopefully be able to source the paragraph. Mobile Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:17, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- I added references for the fourth paragraph, and rephrased a sentence which was not very clear. Unfortunately I could only find references in Japanese for the old plants.--Ita140188 (talk) 08:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Pinging Template:U with the update. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ri-pinging Template:U. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:01, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
. Article is now full referenced and text verified. There is no copy vio and text is neutral. Img is freely licensed. Good to go.Nvvchar. 02:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Is there any way to write a hook that isn't so repetitive? Yoninah (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the Okawachi Power Station is one of the largest pumped-storage hydroelectric power plants in Japan?
- Yoninah: I don't speak Japanese, but when I ran the title through Google Translate, it actually came out as "Okochi power plant", so I think we can get away with removing "Pumped Storage" from the bold link. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U
Template:Outdent Thanks. Restoring tick per Nvvchar's review. Do you think we can get away with renaming the article altogether? Yoninah (talk) 00:08, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the updated hook. The title of the article however follows the title convention for these kinds of plants, regardless how they are defined in their original language. I dont think it should be changed. In every country these power stations have different "official" names but I think it's more clear to have a consistent naming rule in the english wikipedia.--Ita140188 (talk) 06:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)