Template:Did you know nominations/Ostreopsis

From blackwiki
< Template:Did you know nominations
Revision as of 18:40, 18 August 2017 by imported>John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (pass)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ostreopsis

  • Reviewed: Nicola De Giosa
  • Comment: This is a two article QPQ, used also for the Palythoa toxica nomination, from which this nomination has been split. The original nomination was made on 6 August, well within the seven-day requirement for this article, which was created on 4 August.

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 13:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New and long enough, within policy, Earwig detects no copyvios, QPQ done. The hook doesn't reflect the article; the cited study implicated Ostreopsis in the adverse health effects, but not strongly enough for the way the hook is currently worded. A hook that more closely follows the wording of the article/source would be fine. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 23:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Template:Ping How about ALT1? Or do you object to the use of the word "poisoning"? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg That looks good. The source says "about 200" instead of "209" unless I missed something, so I changed the hook to reflect that. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 18:40, 18 August 2017 (UTC)