Template:Did you know nominations/Premio Lo Nuestro 2014
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 00:14, 10 March 2015 by imported>23W
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Premio Lo Nuestro 2014, Premio Lo Nuestro 2015
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Premio Lo Nuestro 2014
- Premio Lo Nuestro 2015 )
- ... that Spanish singer-songwriter Enrique Iglesias (pictured) performed at the Lo Nuestro Awards of 2014 and became the most nominated artist the following year?
- Reviewed: Kajol filmography and The Theory of Everything
Created by Jaespinoza (talk). Self nominated at 21:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC).
- 16px Both articles were created within the week of their nomination, are long enough, and are within policy (no plagiarism found). Hook is neutral, interesting and cited for both articles (assuming good faith for the first article's citation; the second one is in English). QPQs are good. 23W 03:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- 16px Since the 2015 award ceremony has taken place since this nomination was made, I think before this hits the main page the 2015 article needs to be updated to speak about the award ceremony in the past tense, rather than the future tense. Ideally, if there are any important things regarding the winners, that should probably be added to the text as well (such as who won the most awards). Finally, the review does not mention the image; it needs to be confirmed as valid before this is promoted. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Template:User link Template:User link: I saw that the nominator had updated the 2015 article already, but good point. As for the image, it only appears in that article as well. Does it need to be present in both? I can't find anything in the rules about that. 23W 17:48, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- 23W, in my experience it is necessary that the image appear in at least one of the nominated articles, just as the hook facts need appear in at least one of the nominated articles, but not necessarily all of them. The rules are not clear on that point with multi-article hooks; that's the consensus that seems to have developed. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:57, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- 16px Template:Ping It's present in the 2014 article, I meant to say; fair use and all that. Anyway, I copy edited the 2015 article for tense and other grammar things. Guessing it's good now... 23W 00:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
