Template:Did you know nominations/Preoperative care
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 17:44, 10 October 2014 by imported>Mandarax (Fix Bluerasberry's "fix" which actually broke it worse)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Preoperative care
... that preoperative care for minor heart surgery does not usually include cardiac imaging?
- ALT1:
... that people who have minor heart surgery usually do not have cardiac imaging during preoperative care? - Reviewed: Krishnalal Shridharani
- Comment: I work for a health organization and made this article in the course of my job duties described at WP:Choosing Wisely. It is my opinion that this article and hook are presenting noncontroversial health information of general interest.
- ALT1:
Created/expanded by Bluerasberry (talk). Self nominated at 16:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC).
Length, history and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
I've re-opened this and puled it from the queue. What the article says is "Cardiac imaging and cardiac stress tests are usually unnecessary for people who do not have a serious heart condition and who are having surgery unrelated to the heart (my emphasis), not that cardiac imaging is unnecessary for minor heart surgery. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- It looks like the hook has been corrected to reflect the source better. Daniel Case (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, no! I made a mistake, and I see why it was missed in the first check, no fault of Template:U. Template:U is right! Here is a new version:
- ALT2: ... that cardiac imaging during preoperative care is usually not useful for patients having minor surgeries unrelated to the heart?
- ALT3: ... that people who have surgery unrelated to the heart typically do not need cardiac imaging in their preoperative care?
- It would have been embarrassing to have let that mistake through. Thanks for catching it. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, no! I made a mistake, and I see why it was missed in the first check, no fault of Template:U. Template:U is right! Here is a new version: