Template:Did you know nominations/Rhode Island International Horror Film Festival
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 07:19, 12 September 2013 by 72.74.198.36 (talk)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Rhode Island International Horror Film Festival
- ... that proceeds from the Rhode Island International Horror Film Festival have gone to a scholarship fund for college students to study film?
- ALT1:... that the H.P. Lovecraft Walking Tour is one of the most popular attractions at the Rhode Island International Horror Film Festival?
- ALT2:... that the 2010 Rhode Island International Horror Film Festival featured a "Zombiethon Battle"?
- Reviewed: Not self nom, not needed
- Comment: Moved from AFC
Created by 72.74.206.24 (talk), 72.74.203.80 (talk), 72.74.195.34 (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 06:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC).
- ( Multiple issues: a) red links as "Main article" links should be removed, b) if you remove red links that becomes empty section, c) unsourced section d) multiple MoS errors/issues like cap, using bold formatting in a section "H. P. Lovecraft Walking Tour" WP:ALSO. --Tito☸Dutta 11:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Will contact actual nominator (72.74.195.34). Hope s/he finds the message. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- The red link articles are still waiting review on AFC. They were created separately because they would have made the main article huge. The only part of the article that's unsourced is a sentence in the intro. It's supported by multiple citations in the history. If there are manual of style issues (I assume that's what you mean) can a Wikipedian fix it? Isn't that was what Wikipedia:Be bold is for? I thought the only thing required for DYK was for the hooks I submit to be from a reliable source. 72.74.216.249 (talk) 22:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Also note that small MOS issues such as the bolding are not DYK criteria in and of themselves. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Welcome 72..... red links as Main article link or See also links are problematic, c) the Awards section is unsourced, yes, I'll fix minor errors if needed, minor MoS errors are not DYK criteria--Tito☸Dutta 23:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- 72, an abbreviated version of your work in progress would be okay in these empty sections (if you've got the sources). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Here are the links to the AFC pages:
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Rhode Island International Horror Film Festival award winners
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Rhode Island International Horror Film Festival selections
72.74.216.249 (talk) 23:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Observation: I can see awards section have been cited, please check the "Main article" issue, ;last day after your posts I though to quick review those two AFC articles, but, later found almost all are primary sources, If I review I'll ask to add at few *at least 1–2 RS). --Tito☸Dutta 22:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Is that really nessessary? It's not like they're being used to cite anything controversial. Pretty much all of the pages in Category:Lists of films by award are sourced to official websites including the Cannes and Sundance Film Festivals. The List of Academy Award-winning films doesn't even have any sources. Isn't it alright to use primary sources for citing basic facts? 72.74.198.36 (talk) 07:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)