Template:Did you know nominations/Rosika Schwimmer
< Template:Did you know nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 22:02, 11 November 2019 by imported>Maile66 (passes review)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Rosika Schwimmer
Schwimmer by Harris & Ewing
Schwimmer by Harris & Ewing
- ... that in 1929 Rosika Schwimmer (pictured), a woman over 50 and ineligible to serve to defend the country, was denied citizenship by the U.S. Supreme Court for pacifism and became stateless? Source: "She was denied it (citizenship) because she refused to take and oath that she would support the Constitution, if necessary by bearing arms for her country".; "It is agreed that she is qualified for citizenship, except so far as the views …in favor of pacifism… I hardly can see how that is affected by the statement, inasmuch as she is a woman over fifty years of age, and would not be allowed to bear arms if she wanted to." (pp. 72-73); and [https://archive.org/stream/mostdangerouswom00anne_0#page/216/mode/1up "…she was denied American citizenship on the grounds that she 'refused to bear arms', and she died stateless" (p. 216).
- ALT1:...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Improved to Good Article status by SusunW (talk) and Ipigott (talk). Nominated by SusunW (talk) at 15:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC).
- Review by Maile
- QPQ
- QPQ provided and not used on any other nomination
- Eligibility
- Achieved Good Article status on November 6, 2019
- Sourcing
- Article has made use of excellent verifiable sourcing, well-formatted
- Hook
- Hook is 176 characters, sourced as noted in this nomination, and a compilation of sourced statements in the Sections "Statelessness" and "Later Life".
- Images
- Image used in nomination, as well as all in the article, are of good quality and in the Public Domain, uploaded on Commons
- Copyvio check
- Earwig tool shows nothing of concern.
- Spot check also looks good
16px Well done, Template:Re. A truly impressive piece of work on a truly remarkable woman. Here's hoping you take this to FAC. — Maile (talk) 22:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)