Template:FLC withdrawn
Usage
{{subst:FLC withdrawn|ArticleName}}
Produces:
I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if Featured lists are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the Featured list candidate may continue on until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the list is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the ArticleName list is of reasonable quality, it is not yet Featured list quality, and principle contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured list candidate instructions.
{{subst:FLC withdrawn|ArticleName|PR=yes}}
Produces:
I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if Featured lists are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the Featured list candidate may continue on until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the list is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the ArticleName list is of reasonable quality, it is not yet Featured list quality, and principle contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured list candidate instructions. You might consider first working the article up through peer review to prepare for WP:FLC.
See also
- {{FAC withdrawn}}
- {{FARMessage}}
- {{GARMessage}}
| The above documentation is transcluded from Template:FLC withdrawn/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |