Template:GAchecklist
Revision as of 04:19, 31 August 2014 by imported>CaroleHenson (→Good Article nomination: comments so far)
Good Article nomination
- This article was nominated for good article status. The review began on January 15, 2026. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the six good article criteria.
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality: The quality if pretty good, but more editing should be done for encyclopedic tone and brevity.
- Manual of Style compliance:
- Lead - it was well-written and I made a few minor tweaks, there may be some content (awards, etc.) that might be good to add to the intro
- MOS Title translations: good - English translations not in italics appropriate in this case
- Citations: I added a question about long/short citation style in the article talk section below.
- Sections: Good to review the WP:Manual of Style/Visual arts and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout regarding sections. There may be some shuffling of the sections / content grouping from awards down. For example see GA Vincent van Gogh, Auguste Rodin
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources: Material is cited, generally with foreign language sources. Good faith assumption that sources cover the cited content.
- Citations to reliable sources, where required: Yes
- No original research: No indication of an issue
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects: Yes, covers his biographical, educational and career information well
- Focused: Yes, focuses on the types of works made by Bauer
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias: Yes
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): No indication of edit wards
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?: Pass
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail:

- If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate it.
See also
- {{GAList}}