Template:Improvement criteria

From blackwiki
Revision as of 01:05, 10 October 2017 by imported>Anne drew Andrew and Drew (fix RS param)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This box indicates how close the editors think this article is to good article status. It is not an independent review, but an aid to the editors improving the article.
  1. Well written
    • Prose: Unchecked
    • Style: Unchecked
  2. Verifiable
  3. Broad in coverage
    • All major aspects: Unchecked
    • No unnecessary detail: Unchecked
  4. Neutral point of view: Unchecked
  5. Stable: Unchecked
  6. Images: Unchecked
  • Other:

{{{other}}}

This template lists how the article stacks up against the good article criteria. A blank for copy/paste use is:

{{Improvement criteria
  | prose = 
  | style = 

  | sources = 
  | citations = 
  | nor = 

  | major = 
  | nodetail = 

  | npov = 

  | stable = 
  | images = 

  | other = 
  | image =
}}

Todo list for this template:

  • For each template item, list the stages it can progress through
  • Expand to include the featured article criteria

The following is a minimum Good Article (WP:GA?)

{{Improvement criteria
  | prose = clear, concise, and grammatically correct
  | style = Complies as per [[WP:GA?]]

  | sources = reliable sources
  | citations = well-formatted
  | nor = 25/12/2006

  | major = all
  | nodetail = Done

  | npov = 25/12/2006

  | stable = 25/12/2006
  | images = appropriate, captioned, copyright-checked

  | other = 
  | image =
}}

All items should include at least a date of review (although the example above doesn't)