Template:Infobox US Supreme Court case/testcases
< Template:Infobox US Supreme Court case
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 20:14, 20 August 2008 by imported>MZMcBride (new page)
United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
| United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs | |
|---|---|
| Argued January 20, 1966 Decided March 28, 1966 | |
| Full case name | United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs |
| Citations | 383 U.S. 715 (more) |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 343 F.2d 609 (6th cir., 1965), reversed. |
| Holding | |
| In order for a United States district court to have pendent jurisdiction over a state-law cause of action, state and federal claims must arise from the same "common nucleus of operative fact" and the plaintiff must expect to try them all at once. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Brennan, joined by Black, Douglas, Stewart, White, Fortas |
| Concurrence | Harlan, joined by Clark |
| Warren took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const., Art III § 2; Labor Management Relations Act | |
Roe v. Wade
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
| Roe v. Wade | |
|---|---|
| Argued December 13, 1971 Reargued October 11, 1972 Decided January 22, 1973 | |
| Full case name | Jane Roe, et al. v. Henry Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County |
| Citations | 410 U.S. 113 (more) 93 S. Ct. 705; 35 L. Ed. 2d 147; 1973 U.S. LEXIS 159 |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Judgment for plaintiffs, injunction denied, 314 F. Supp. 1217 (N.D. Tex. 1970); probable jurisdiction noted, 402 U.S. 941 (1971); set for reargument, 408 U.S. 919 (1972) |
| Subsequent | Rehearing denied, 410 U.S. 959 (1973) |
| Holding | |
| Texas law making it a crime to assist a woman to get an abortion violated her due process rights. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas affirmed in part, reversed in part. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Blackmun, joined by Burger, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall, Powell |
| Concurrence | Burger |
| Concurrence | Douglas |
| Concurrence | Stewart |
| Dissent | White, joined by Rehnquist |
| Dissent | Rehnquist |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. Amend. XIV; Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 1191–94, 1196 | |
Sinochem International Co., Ltd. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corporation
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
| Sinochem International Co., Ltd. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Argued January 9, 2007 Decided March 5, 2007 | |
| Full case name | Sinochem International Co., Ltd. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corporation |
| Citations | 549 U.S. 422 (more) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Ginsburg, joined by unanimous |
Herring v. United States
Blank template (commonly needed)
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
| Full case name | Template:PAGENAMEBASE |
|---|---|
Blank template (uncommonly needed)
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
| Full case name | Template:PAGENAMEBASE |
|---|---|
| Case opinion | |
| Per curiam | |