User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 08:34, 5 May 2013 diff hist +1,328 Template:Did you know nominations/Geology of North America Not much I can do; bad article; owned; bad science; confusing; contradictory; but google searchers are dominating. Pow! Out goes that messenger.
- 04:08, 1 May 2013 diff hist +212 Template:Did you know nominations/Geology of North America
- 06:22, 28 April 2013 diff hist +354 Template:Did you know nominations/Helicia Probably better discussed elsewhere--this is for the DYK.
- 05:27, 28 April 2013 diff hist +30 Template:Did you know nominations/Helicia Stop changing my words; gibberish means "overly obscure and technical." And the writing was just that, check a dictionary.
- 23:16, 27 April 2013 diff hist +199 Template:Did you know nominations/Geology of North America
- 10:42, 26 April 2013 diff hist +820 Template:Did you know nominations/Geology of North America imo anything not in the article cannot be directly sourced
- 10:35, 26 April 2013 diff hist +592 Template:Did you know nominations/Helicia This article is difficult to read, contains distantly related information, possibly over-cited without value.