Template:Did you know nominations/Capture of Wakefield

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:46, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Capture of Wakefield

  • ... that during the capture of Wakefield, the town's commander was said to have led a counterattack "on a horse in his nightshirt", possibly because he was hungover? Source: Brooks, Richard (2005). Cassell's Battlefields of Britain and Ireland.

5x expanded by Harrias (talk). Self-nominated at 08:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Looks good - five times expanded in the last two days, readable prose at 6,000 characters, neutral article, well sourced and referenced, interesting hook with proper formatting. Source is offline but appears reputable, taken in good faith. Good job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Symbol question.svg per WP:WEASEL the claims of that he led the counterattack in his nightshirt, and was hungover, need to be attributed to someone.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Sorry, had a mis-click with the rollback button there! Claims now attributed inline. Harrias talk 10:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping great, that's fine about the rollback - I figured that's what happened, and I've been there myself before... thanks for the speedy clarification in the article. Do you think we could add "said by historians" into the hook? Or will that make it too clunky?  — Amakuru (talk) 10:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Template:PingI have proposed a tweaked alternative hook below, conflating the two claims into one, to avoid double uncertainty as it were. What do you think? Harrias talk 10:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that during the capture of Wakefield, some historians claim the town's commander led a counterattack "in his nightshirt" because he was hungover?
Symbol voting keep.svg great, that looks good, thanks! Signing ALT1 off now, obviously AGF on the sourcing as I haven't seen it. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 10:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)