Template:Did you know nominations/Grolier Codex
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of Grolier Codex's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 00:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC).
DYK toolbox |
---|
Grolier Codex
- ... that the authenticity of the supposedly Maya Grolier Codex is disputed, even though it uses pre-Columbian paper?
- Reviewed: Abouriou
Created by Simon Burchell (talk). Self nominated at 22:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC).
- New article from redirect. Simon Burchell (talk) 23:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Article newness, length, and general compliance with policy have been confirmed. Suggested fact is interesting and supported by an inline citation. On a non-DYK basis, I have only one piece of advice: the lead is half referenced and half not. Either style is acceptable, but I would prefer consistency (which would mean incorporating the first paragraph material into the body in full). Overall, very well written and interesting article that I enjoyed reading. Good work. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)