Template:Did you know nominations/Cecelia Goetz
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 11:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cecelia Goetz
... that Cecelia Goetz delivered the opening statement in the Krupp Trial on December 8, 1947, the only woman to give an opening statement at the Nuremberg trials? Thus [Goetz] became the only woman to give an opening statement at Nuremberg (p. 5)ALT1:... that Cecelia Goetz was offered a supervisory role at the United States Department of Justice—the first woman to receive such an opportunity—but declined it to serve as a prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials? … Cecelia Goetz, the first female attorney to be offered a supervisory role at the department – an offer she turned down in order to come to NurembergALT2:... that, in order to serve as a prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials, Cecelia Goetz had to receive a disability waiver from chief prosecutor Telford Taylor because she was a woman? she decided to make a direct appeal to Telford Taylor, the chief U.S. prosecutor at Nuremberg. … 'Nevertheless, in order for me to be processed, Taylor had to sign a “waiver of disability” form—the disability being the fact that I was a woman.' (p. 184; source may require registration to view at the Internet Archive)
- Reviewed: I believe I am currently exempt, as I don't yet have a DYK, but I have reviewed Milton (electoral district).
- Comment:
- Citations to the Amann article are to the paywalled published version, so page numbers will differ from the free SSRN version linked in the bibliography.
- ALT1 could be reserved for December 8, if possible under DYK rules.
- There is an excellent, high-res photograph of Goetz at Nuremberg available online from USC, but I don't know about the licensing. I would imagine it's fair use to include, but would want someone to review before uploading. In addition, the Library of Congress has this (much lower-res) image, but indicates there might be re-use restrictions. Anyone have any ideas here? AleatoryPonderings (talk) 17:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Moved to mainspace by AleatoryPonderings (talk). Self-nominated at 17:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC).
- I'll review this Mujinga (talk) 09:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Oho! QPQ check gives zero DYKs, but from your talkpage you do have some credits, so perhaps by now you do need to do a QPQ ... therefore it's good you already did one :) Mujinga (talk) 09:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- :) AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:47, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hiya great thanks for the responses, yes understood on the timescale for the pic but it's still worth doing for the article itself i guess. I'll look into the rest now. Mujinga (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- OK AleatoryPonderings so ALT2a is great, it just needs the citation used (Morello) to be put on the prior sentence in the article which discuss the waiver, I'm being pernickety because of the rule "Each fact in the hook must be supported in the article by at least one inline citation to a reliable source, appearing no later than the end of the sentence(s) offering that fact". If you are happy to proceed with just ALT2a, that's fine with me, the other two could be rewritten as well. Mujinga (talk) 16:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I think this should do the trick? Must have gotten mixed up as to which sources I was using … And yes, I think alt2a is the best so far, so let's just stick with that :) AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)