Template:Did you know nominations/Health and safety hazards of nanomaterials
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Health and safety hazards of nanomaterials
- ... that the health and safety hazards of nanomaterials include inhalation exposure (pictured) and dust explosions? Source: [1], pp. 17 and 24
- Reviewed: Cannon Coaster
Moved to mainspace by John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk). Self-nominated at 01:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC).
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Template:Ping Well, I thought that dust explosions of carbon nanotubes were a non-obvious hazard... A lot of the more interesting facts of the article are a bit too technical for a DYK hook (two examples: filters are better at capturing smaller nanoparticles because they have more Brownian motion; nanoparticle size doesn't affect the combustion rate because volitilization is so fast that the combustion itself is the rate-limiting step). ALT1 below emphasizes the dust explosions more, ALT2 is along the lines of what you suggested. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the health and safety hazards of nanomaterials include not only inhalation exposure (pictured) but also dust explosions?
- ALT2: ... that in animal studies of the health and safety hazards of nanomaterials, carbon nanotubes had similar inhalation exposure effects (pictured) to asbestos?
- Template:Replyto I'll pass ALT2 if you make it "similar ... to" rather than "similar ... as", which I find too grating. The prose style is still too ponderous and wordy for my taste but that shouldn't be a blocker at DYK which is for new material. (I was amused by an item in the news this morning about a hyper-local multi-passenger pooled vehicle – a bus!) I checked the hook length and it's 154 which is inside the DYK limit of 200. Andrew D. (talk) 06:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Change made. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 07:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks -- we're good to go then. I'm still interested in dust hazards myself -- for example, the metal dust in the London Underground -- and so will continue to follow the progress of the topic. Andrew D. (talk) 09:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Change made. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 07:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)