Template:Did you know nominations/Inspector General report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Inspector General report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation
- ... that an Inspector General review did not find evidence of political bias in the opening of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, but found "serious performance failures" regarding FISA applications? Source: TIME: Template:Tq National Law Journal: Template:Tq
Created by Starship.paint (talk). Self-nominated at 13:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC).
- Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Thanks Template:U. I will need time to expand the article to (1) clarify the topic and (2) make the FISA part more interesting. Perhaps let me ping you once I have finished that?
- I feel that ALT2 is a bit inaccurate - the actual quote by Barr is Template:Purple, so proposing ALT3 below in the meantime. starship.paint (talk) 23:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
ALT3: ... that the United States Attorney General rejected his own Inspector General's findings that the FBI investigation into Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign was justified?
- Template:Re If you want to suggest something else, feel free to do so but I'd be
with ALT3. Regards SoWhy 08:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)