Template:Did you know nominations/Kairana migration row

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Kairana and Kandhla migration row

Created by Skr15081997 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:31, 17 June 2016 (UTC).

Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Page has been renamed Kairana and Sardhana migration row. Reopening DYK nomination for a fresh review. Yoninah (talk) 09:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Has the article been changed at all from when it was a duplicate? The article may have a new title, but the only place Sardhana is mentioned is in the article title, not its body, which strikes me as problematic. The C of E|, can you remember which article this duplicated? If nothing else we need to see whether anything was copied; if it was, then it needs to be 5x expanded from the copied material, not merely at least 1500 prose characters. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
No, I didn't get to see it before the deletion. I stated that based on the rationale that was given for the deletion. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 21:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Template:U, the original CSD tag said "This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion because: Kairana exodus page already exists." Please see Kairana hindu exodus. Template:U was one of the admins who was involved in some of the redirects and might be able to give a clearer answer here. — Maile (talk) 22:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Well, in fact, I know it for sure now, Mukim Kala was deleted 20:41, 18 June 2016 by Template:U, for "Extremely negative POV". The section "Kairana mass exodus" read: Template:Tq — Maile (talk) 23:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Now...with all that said above, the history is still intact on this nomination's article. It looks to me like RHaworth did an "unspeedy" and moved Kairana migration row intact to User:Skr15081997/Kairana at 20:02 on 18 June. User:Skr15081997 moved it to main space on 02:11 on 19 June, after the other article had already been deleted. The history of the article goes all the way back to when it was created by Skr15081997 on 17 June. Comparing the histories, it looks to me like this article is word-for-word as it was before deletion. — Maile (talk) 23:30, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • BlueMoonset, I have moved the page to Kairana and Kandhla migration row. I haven't copied anything for this article except the line Template:Tq. I have also added more content to the article. Thanks, --Skr15081997 (talk) 13:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Looks like this is ready for review. Montanabw(talk) 05:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Symbol voting keep.svg QPQ checks out. New enough, long enough, and copyvio-free. The issues with duplication vis-a-vis new content seem to have been sorted out above. The article is neutrally written, and cited inline. Likewise the hook. AGF on non-english sources. Vanamonde (talk) 07:59, 23 July 2016 (UTC)