Template:Did you know nominations/San Nicolò all'Arena, Verona

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewing guide WMFLabs Dup detector Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count Reviewers' template Disambig links External links Find sources (notability)

San Nicolò all'Arena, Verona, San Sebastiano, Verona

• ( Back to T:TDYK )

• ( Article history links: San Nicolò all'Arena, Verona
• San Sebastiano, Verona )

Façade at San Nicolò all'Arena

• ... that after the former church of San Sebastiano in Verona was bombed in 1945, its façade was relocated to San Nicolò all'Arena (pictured)? Source: "Tra il 1951 ed il 1953 si risolse la questione smontando e traslando a San Nicolò i resti della facciata della ex-chiesa di San Sebastiano dei Gesuiti, distrutta dai bombardamenti bellici." (source)

• Reviewed: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Tower, Fremantle Fortress

Created by Xwejnusgozo (talk). Self-nominated at 13:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC).

• Template:Ping Thanks for the review! You're right that the sources are rather limited, and I'm sure there are better ones out there, but these were the only ones which I found readily available on the internet (unfortunately I do not have access to any literature on Verona).

As a sidenote regarding the use of the DYK checklist template, whenever I use it I usually add just "y" or "n" within the template and add all my comments at the bottom (see for example my review of the Fremantle Fortress nomination) to avoid getting the crosses. Note that the template is not obligatory - if you want you can also just write your comments for the review (you can still use the template as a guideline or checklist in this case).

All the best! Xwejnusgozo (talk) 12:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I think I'll likely do that next time if the template remains the same. Anyways, just to make it clear to anyone quickly scrolling by, I'll restate: article is ready with AGF in my view. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 17:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)